~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~ [ freetext search ] ~ [ file search ] ~

Linux Cross Reference
Linux/Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt

Version: ~ [ 2.4.21 ] ~ [ 2.6.10 ] ~ [ 2.6.16 ] ~ [ 2.6.19 ] ~ [ 2.6.23 ] ~ [ 2.6 ] ~
Architecture: ~ [ i386 ] ~ [ ia64 ] ~ [ x86_64 ] ~ [ um ] ~ [ arm ] ~ [ ppc ] ~ [ powerpc ] ~

  1 Everything you ever wanted to know about Linux 2.6 -stable releases.
  2 
  3 Rules on what kind of patches are accepted, and which ones are not, into the
  4 "-stable" tree:
  5 
  6  - It must be obviously correct and tested.
  7  - It cannot be bigger than 100 lines, with context.
  8  - It must fix only one thing.
  9  - It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a
 10    problem..." type thing).
 11  - It must fix a problem that causes a build error (but not for things
 12    marked CONFIG_BROKEN), an oops, a hang, data corruption, a real
 13    security issue, or some "oh, that's not good" issue.  In short, something
 14    critical.
 15  - No "theoretical race condition" issues, unless an explanation of how the
 16    race can be exploited is also provided.
 17  - It cannot contain any "trivial" fixes in it (spelling changes,
 18    whitespace cleanups, etc).
 19  - It must be accepted by the relevant subsystem maintainer.
 20  - It must follow the Documentation/SubmittingPatches rules.
 21 
 22 
 23 Procedure for submitting patches to the -stable tree:
 24 
 25  - Send the patch, after verifying that it follows the above rules, to
 26    stable@kernel.org.
 27  - The sender will receive an ACK when the patch has been accepted into the
 28    queue, or a NAK if the patch is rejected.  This response might take a few
 29    days, according to the developer's schedules.
 30  - If accepted, the patch will be added to the -stable queue, for review by
 31    other developers.
 32  - Security patches should not be sent to this alias, but instead to the
 33    documented security@kernel.org address.
 34 
 35 
 36 Review cycle:
 37 
 38  - When the -stable maintainers decide for a review cycle, the patches will be
 39    sent to the review committee, and the maintainer of the affected area of
 40    the patch (unless the submitter is the maintainer of the area) and CC: to
 41    the linux-kernel mailing list.
 42  - The review committee has 48 hours in which to ACK or NAK the patch.
 43  - If the patch is rejected by a member of the committee, or linux-kernel
 44    members object to the patch, bringing up issues that the maintainers and
 45    members did not realize, the patch will be dropped from the queue.
 46  - At the end of the review cycle, the ACKed patches will be added to the
 47    latest -stable release, and a new -stable release will happen.
 48  - Security patches will be accepted into the -stable tree directly from the
 49    security kernel team, and not go through the normal review cycle.
 50    Contact the kernel security team for more details on this procedure.
 51 
 52 
 53 Review committee:
 54 
 55  - This is made up of a number of kernel developers who have volunteered for
 56    this task, and a few that haven't.

~ [ source navigation ] ~ [ diff markup ] ~ [ identifier search ] ~ [ freetext search ] ~ [ file search ] ~

This page was automatically generated by the LXR engine.
Visit the LXR main site for more information.